BBC
The Archbishop of Canterbury is said to be overwhelmed
by the "hostility of the response" after his call for
parts of Sharia law to be recognised in the UK.
Friends of Dr Rowan Williams say he is in a state of
shock and cannot believe the criticism from his own
Church.
All the main political parties, secular groups and
some senior Muslims have expressed dismay at his
comments.
However, the Bishop of Hulme, the Rt Rev Stephen
Lowe, criticised the "disgraceful" treatment of Dr
Williams.
Legal code
The BBC understands from sources who work on
Christian-Muslim interfaith issues that Dr Williams has
faced a barrage of criticism from within the Church and
has been genuinely taken aback by how his words were
received.
 |
He's not fit to be Archbishop of Canterbury,
he doesn't seem to know what his own business is
|
Islamic Sharia law is a legal and social code
designed to help Muslims live their daily lives, but it
has proved controversial in the West for the extreme
nature of some of its punishments.
BBC News religious affairs correspondent Robert
Pigott says both traditionalists and liberals in the
Church have their own reasons for criticising Dr
Williams.
Traditionalists maintain that English law is based on
Biblical values and that no parallel system could be
tolerated in the UK.
Liberal Anglicans believe giving Sharia legal status
would be to the detriment of women and gay people.
Resignation call
Among those critical of the archbishop is the
chairman of evangelical Church group Reform, the
Reverend Rod Thomas.
"The Church at the moment, and the country, needs a
clear lead. The country is itself in a debate about its
own sense of identity," he said.
"The moral values that we pursue are ones that we
need to know are clearly grounded, and it would be most
helpful for the leader of the Church to be able to
explain to people how the values we cherish stem from
our Christian tradition."
UKIP MEP Gerard Batten said it would be the "thin end
of the wedge" and called on the archbishop to resign.
He said: "I think he's shown he is totally unfit for
the role he undertakes. He's not fit to be Archbishop of
Canterbury, he doesn't seem to know what his own
business is, and he's not fit to sit in the House of
Lords. I think he should go."
'Hysterical misrepresentations'
However, there has been some support for Dr Williams.
The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said it was
grateful for the archbishop's "thoughtful intervention".
The organisation added that it was saddened by the
"hysterical misrepresentations" of his speech, which
would only "drive a wedge between British people"
Muhammed Abdul Bari, Secretary-General of the MCB,
said: "The archbishop is not advocating implementation
of the Islamic penal system in Britain.
"His recommendation is confined to the civil system
of Sharia law, and only in accordance with English law
and agreeable to established notions of human rights."
The archbishop had been "ridiculed" and "lampooned"
by some people, according to Bishop Lowe.
"We have probably one of the greatest and the
brightest Archbishops of Canterbury we have had for many
a long day," he said.
Catherine Heseltine, from the Muslim Public Affairs
Committee, said some people might be getting the wrong
end of the stick.
"I'm concerned this debate is getting out of control
because people hear the word Sharia and instantly scary
images of beheadings," she said.
Dr Williams told BBC Radio 4 on Thursday that he
believed the adoption of some Sharia law in the UK
seemed "unavoidable".
In an interview with BBC correspondent Christopher
Landau, Dr Williams said Muslims should not have to
choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural
loyalty or state loyalty".
Under English law, people may devise their own way to
settle a dispute in front of an agreed third party as
long as both sides agree to the process.
Muslim Sharia courts and Orthodox Jewish courts which
already exist in the UK come into this category.